Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.
|
|
Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Is y = mx + b linear?
Replies:
9
Last Post:
May 15, 2000 10:42 PM
|
 |
|
|
Re: Is y = mx + b linear?
Posted:
May 15, 2000 1:23 PM
|
|
In article <8fo83o$mfm@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA>, kovarik@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA (Zdislav V. Kovarik) writes:
> [...]
> :>> Is y(x) = mx + b a linear function? > > [...] > > Habits are hard to break: some people are so much in a hurry (or so they > think) that they tend to abbreviate, often to the detriment of clarity. > > The function that transforms x into m*x+b is called a "linear polynomial > function", to place it in the sequence "constant, linear, quadratic, > cubic, ...". It is a burden of tradition we have to live with, even if it > clashes with more recent conventions. Now some drop the word "polynomial" > and the corresponding context, and a misunderstanding arises.
The earliest usages of "linear" were surely geometrical: linear measure, etc. (W.W. Sawyer says that "straight line" comes from "stretched linen [thread]".)
The earliest usage of "linear" in algebra was presumably in the phrase "linear equation". And this got its name because (if it's in two variables) its graph is a straight line - whether through the origin or not.
So whilst, if one takes the current usage as given, the older usage is a "burden", one could take a more etymological point of view and blame the "burden" on those who changed the word's meaning.
From this point of view, the people who were in too much of a hurry, and who introduced the potential for confusion, were those who first abbreviated "homogeneous linear transformation" by omitting "homogeneous".
-- Robert Hill
|
|
|
|