The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: How much is known about this set
Replies: 10   Last Post: Jun 10, 2003 1:56 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Earle Jones

Posts: 92
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: How much is known about this set
Posted: Jun 9, 2003 1:17 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>,
Gerry Myerson <> wrote:

> In article <>,
> Rasmus Villemoes <> wrote:
> => Let
> =>
> => A = { n \in N | there exists infinitely many pairs of primes
> => (p_i,p_j) such that p_i - p_j = n }
> =>
> => The question "Does 2 belong to A" is then equivalent to whether there
> => are infinitely many twin primes or not. I know this question hasn't
> => been answered yet, and likewise for the questions "Does 4,6,...
> => belong to A". But it is for instance known whether A is infinite or
> => not? Is it known whether A is empty? Is anything at all known about
> => A? (except the trivial facts such as "every member of A is even"
> => etc.)
> I don't think the present state of knowledge is good enough to rule
> out the possibility that for every n there are only finitely many
> pairs of primes differing by n.

I vaguely remember a proof (from Rouse Ball's old book) that the sum
of the reciprocals of the primes is unbounded. But, the sum of the
reciprocals of the prime pairs is in fact bounded.

Does that ring a bell?


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.