Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Rhumb Lines and Great Circle Routes

```
Date: 09/24/98 at 14:49:50
From: Ira Leeds
Subject: Rhumb Lines and Great Circle Routes

In a recent Geometry class, we came across a question about the
shortest distance between two points. The answer the text gave was
three separate solutions. a) a straight line b) a rhumb line and
c) a great circle. We determined that there was a different answer for
each type of geometry. We were wondering, what is a rhumb line and what
is a great circle and how do they apply to shortest distance between
two points?
```

```
Date: 09/24/98 at 17:52:00
From: Doctor Rick
Subject: Re: Rhumb Lines and Great Circle Routes

Hi, Ira. Recently I helped a Coast Guard lieutenant work out distances
along rhumb lines and great circles. Straight lines would be so much
easier - but hard to travel! I'm sure you talked about the fact that,
although the shortest line between New York and London is a straight
line, you'd have to tunnel far below the surface of the earth to
travel along it. We're really interested in the shortest distance on
the surface of the earth between two points.

You might think that if you take a map of the world and draw a
straight line from New York to London, that would be the shortest
distance between the two cities. But it depends a lot on the type of
map - that is, the map projection. You can probably find at least two
kinds of world map in your school, a Mercator map (that's the one
with Greenland as big as all of South America - see the following

Mercator's Projection: Robert Israel, Univ. of British Columbia
http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel/m103/mercator/mercator.html

and an equal-area map (there are different kinds, but they are popular
because they don't shortchange the tropical countries the way the
Mercator does). If you lay a ruler between New York and London on each
map, you will find that the two lines pass through different places en
route. They can't both be the shortest route - and in fact neither of
them is.

The line you made on the Mercator map is a rhumb line. After what I
just said, you might think, "so what?" But the Mercator map does have a
special property that other maps don't: you can read off a compass
reading from that line you drew. If you got in an airplane in New York
and headed in that direction, you would eventually get to London. (I'm
ignoring the problem that compasses don't point to the north geographic
pole, but to the north magnetic pole. That's another subject.) If you
did the same with an equal-area map, you'd miss London.

I already said that a rhumb line isn't the shortest distance between
New York and London. It's just the easiest route to follow. Look again
at that rhumb line you made on the Mercator map. Then think about the
fact that airplanes that fly between New York and London routinely fly
over Newfoundland. That's far to the north of the rhumb line. Why do
they fly there? Because the actual shortest distance between two points
on the surface of the earth goes that way.

Now take a globe. Find New York and London, and turn the globe so that
they are on a line around the middle of the globe, as if you moved them
to the equator. Where is Newfoundland? It should be on the "equator"
too. That line around the middle of the globe is a great circle. One
way to think about it is that if you sliced the globe right down the
middle in any direction, along a plane that passes through the center
of the globe, the line you made on the surface would be a great circle.

On the cross-section of the globe that you exposed, you could draw the
true shortest distance between New York and London, a straight line
that cuts across the curve of the earth. But the arc of a great circle
is the closest you can come to that line without going beneath the
surface.

So there you have it. In Euclidean space, a straight line is the
shortest distance between two points. But in a sense, we don't live on
a Euclidean world. If you want to go beyond the horizon, a great circle
is the shortest distance between two points. A rhumb line is not the
shortest distance in any sense except on a Mercator map, but it is very
useful. In fact, those airplanes probably don't really travel a great
circle; they approximate it with a sequence of rhumb lines so they only
have to change compass bearing once in a while. (Well, with computer
navigation, maybe they do travel true great circle routes now.)

everything, because there is a lot to explore in the topic of maps and

- Doctor Rick, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Conic Sections/Circles
High School Geometry
High School Higher-Dimensional Geometry
High School Practical Geometry
Middle School Conic Sections/Circles
Middle School Geometry
Middle School Higher-Dimensional Geometry

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search