Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

```
Date: 9/20/95 at 16:20:1
Subject: standard deviations

Dr. Math,

One of my colleagues here at Friends' Central School in Wynnewood
said a question came up in his precalculus class which he could
not answer. It's in two parts:

1.  Why does a standard deviation take the square root of the
average of the sum of the squared differences between X and
X mean instead of the average of the absolute value differences?

2.  What is the reasoning behind dividing by n vs. n-1 in the
population versus sample standard deviations?

Well, I couldn't come up with a satisfactory answer, so I'm ASKING
DR MATH.

Look forward to hearing from you on this as are the students!
```

```
Date: 9/26/95 at 7:53:42
From: Doctor Steve
Subject: Re: statistics

to write back to have something explained.--Steve

1. The reason that squared values are used is so that the
algebra is easier.  For example, the variance (second central
moment) is equal to the expected value of the square of the
distribution (second non-central moment) minus the square of the
mean of the distribution.  This would not be true, in general,
if the absolute value definition were used.

This is not to say that the absolute value definition is
without merit.  It is quite reasonable for use as a measure of
the spread of the distribution.  In fact, I have heard of
someone who used it in teaching a course in statistics.  (I
think he used it because he thought it was a more 'natural' way

2. The reason that n-1 is used instead of n in the formula for
the sample variance is as follows:  The sample variance can be
thought of as a random variable, i.e. a function which takes on
different values for different samples of the same distribution.
Its use is as an estimate for the true variance of the
distribution. In statistics, one typically does not know the
true variance; one uses the sample variance to ESTIMATE the true
variance.  Since the sample variance is a random variable, it
usually has a mean, or average value. One would hope that this
average value is close to the actual value that the sample
variance is estimating, i.e. close to the true variance.  In
fact, if the n-1 is used in the defining formula for the sample
variance, then it is possible to prove that the average value of
the sample variance EQUALS the true variance.  If we replace the
n-1 by an n, then the average value of the sample variance is
((n-1)/n) times as large as the true variance.

A random variable X which is used to estimate a parameter p
of a distribution is called an unbiased estimator if the
expected value of X equals p.  Thus, using the n-1 gives an
unbiased estimator of the variance of a distribution.

-Doctor Steve,  The Geometry Forum

```
Associated Topics:
High School Statistics

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search