Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Ask Dr. Math - Questions and Answers from our Archives
_____________________________________________
Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math
_____________________________________________

Civil Engineering and Math


Date: 2/24/97 at 09:53:24
From: Anonymous
Subject: Civil Engineering and Math

I would like to know some specific concepts of math and physics that are
commonly used by civil engineers.


Date: 2/26/97 at 00:48:00
From: Doctor Barney
Subject: Re: Civil Engineering and Math

Arithmetic, algebra, geometry, calculus, differential equations, complex 
analysis, probability and statistics.  Civil engineers use all of these 
forms of math and many, many other forms as well.  

This is a great question!  I could write about this for days, but that 
would probably give you more information than you need.  Actually, there 
are some common misconceptions about the use of mathematics in the 
applied sciences, like engineering: most engineers actually spend a 
very small portion of their time carrying out mathematical calculation.  
But that does not mean that mathematics is not important to engineering.  
In fact, mathematics is indispensable.  

Let me expand my answer into four different areas, because I have 
thought of four different ways in which civil engineers (and other 
engineers) use mathematics.  I'm sure there are many others.  These are 
just the first four that come to mind:

1. To help them understand the chemistry and physics fundamental to the 
   construction of civil engineering projects;
2. To carry out the technical calculations necessary to plan a 
   construction project;
3. To help them with modeling and simulations to predict the behavior 
   of structures before they are actually built;  and
4. To help them with business decisions and other "non-technical" 
   aspects of their jobs.

1. To understand chemistry and physics. Civil engineers are frequently 
concerned with two fundamental technical questions: The first question, 
"how strong is this material?" can be answered through material 
science, which is a branch of chemistry. The second, "how strong will 
this part need to be?" is usually answered by statics and dynamics, 
which are branches of physics. Now, long before the engineer ever 
enrolled in his or her first engineering class, he or she probably had 
a good understanding of the basic principals of chemistry and physics 
(from a high school science class, perhaps) and virtually all of these 
fundamental scientific principals are described, analyzed, proven, and 
predicted through the use of one or more form of mathematics. And let 
me stress that the math is not only needed to pass those classes in the 
first place, but even as the engineers (and scientists) apply scientific 
principals in their respective fields, they continue to use the 
mathematics which define these principals.

For example, suppose you were designing a concrete freeway overpass.
One of the things you would need to understand is how the concrete cures 
as a function of time. How long does one "batch" need to cure before 
construction can continue? When does it need to be tested? How long 
until the bridge can be opened to regular traffic?  (Concrete appears to 
"dry" in a day or two, but actually does not reach its full strength for 
over a month!) Well, it turns out that the strength of the concrete as a 
function of time is described by and equation of the form S=c(1-e^-kt)  
where S is the strength at time t and c and k are constants specific to 
the type of concrete you are using. (How strong is the concrete at time 
t=0?  How strong is it as t approaches infinity? How long will it take 
to get to half of its final strength?) Now, the important point here is 
that the engineer is not the person who calculates when the concrete 
will reach a point when it can be used without concern to its cure being 
complete; that is a job for a chemist or a material scientist at the 
factory where the concrete is made, who will make this calculation based 
on the type and amount of chemicals used in each particular type of 
concrete.  But nevertheless, the engineers need to understand  the 
properties of the materials they are working with, and in this case 
those properties are described by an exponential equation.  

2. To carry out the technical calculations necessary to plan a 
construction project. This is the more obvious aspect of the engineers' 
jobs that everyone tends to think about: "If a circular concrete 
support column for a particular bridge needs to be able to hold up 28 
tons and the concrete being used can support  4,575 pounds per square 
foot, what diameter does the column need to be?  If the column is 22 
feet tall, how many cubic yards of concrete will be needed to make the 
column?" ...that sort of thing. Engineers really do carry out some of 
these types of calculations, but the mathematics textbooks tend to 
simplify the problems quite a bit (which is not necessarily a bad 
thing; this type of problem really does illustrate how specific 
mathematical concepts are applied to other fields.) For engineers in 
the world, the support column mentioned above might also need to hold 
28 tons after it is eighty years old, has been crashed into by three 
cars and a truck, and has survived four earthquakes and one flood. Now 
how would you calculate the diameter? By the way, don't forget that 
the concrete at the bottom of the column also needs to hold the weight 
of the column itself in addition to the 28 ton "load." See what I mean?  
In the real world the problems are always harder.  

3. To help them with modeling and simulations. These days, before 
anyone builds anything that costs very much money, they usually develop 
some type of mathematical model, and analyze it using a computer. A 
mathematical model is a set of equations which describe what we think 
would happen to something if we really built it the way that it is 
described in the model. You may have seen a computerized "stick 
drawing" of the space shuttle on the TV news, where they show the 
shuttle turning from side-to-side and it looks like it's 
three-dimensional. Well, that "stick-drawing" is a graphical 
representation of a mathematical model. And NASA did not make that 
computer model just so they could see what the shuttle would look like, 
they made it so they could learn as much as they could about it before 
it was built. Things like how it would fly, how strong certain parts 
would have to be, and how hot it would get on re-entry. The equations 
that describe what happens to any one part are not very difficult to 
write down, but solving the equations for all of these parts at the same 
time would be extremely time-consuming. That is why this type of 
modeling is almost always done using a computer. The computer solves 
the mathematical equations, the computer scientists programmed the 
equations into the computer, but (pay attention here) the engineers had 
to write down the equations in the first place. For that, they needed 
to know a lot of mathematics, especially calculus and differential 
equations.

Many, many other engineering projects are modeled using mathematics, 
although the model may not be as complicated as the one for the space 
shuttle.  Engineering projects like bridges and buildings, which you may 
not here about on the TV news but which are also very, very important, 
are usually simulated or modeled before they are built.  

4. To help them with business decisions and other "non-technical" 
aspects of their jobs. I know that this is probably not the answer you 
were looking for, but  I feel obliged to discuss it, for completeness.  
The fact is, very little engineering ever occurs without someone 
spending some money, and in most cases, a whole lot of money. And 
because of that, many engineers spend a significant portion of their 
time (almost half?) concerned with the business aspects of their 
projects, as opposed to the technical aspects. For example, before you 
build a bridge, you had better know how much it will cost, how long it 
will take, and at what point in the project will you need the money.  
What type of equipment will you need and for how long? Exactly what 
materials you will need, and when, and all that sort of thing. You 
would also need to figure out what is the cheapest kind of bridge you 
could build. If one bridge is cheaper but takes longer to build, would 
that be better or worse? What is the environmental impact of building a 
certain type of bridge in a certain location? All of these "business" 
questions can be very complicated issues, and different forms of 
mathematics can help people answer them: mathematics like algebra, 
probability, statistics, even calculus. This brings up the point that 
engineers are not the only professionals who need a strong mathematical 
background.  Many professionals are routinely faced with this same type 
of "business" problem that can be solved using mathematics.  
Professionals such as business executives, lawyers, accountants, 
business analysts, government officials, financial planners, etc. 

The point is, although civil engineers do have technical aspects of 
their jobs which require specialized mathematical skills, they also have 
many other aspects of their jobs which require the same mathematical 
skills that most other professionals need, which should not be 
underestimated.

-Doctor Barney,  The Math Forum
 Check out our web site!  http://mathforum.org/dr.math/   

    
Associated Topics:
High School About Math
High School Geometry
High School Practical Geometry

Search the Dr. Math Library:


Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):
 
Click only once for faster results:

[ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.]

all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase
parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

_____________________________________
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search
_____________________________________

Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/