Estimation vs. RoundingDate: 01/08/2002 at 11:21:31 From: Pam Langer Subject: Estimation vs. rounding On our testing we have questions about estimating answers and rounding answers. The two methods give different answers. How are the two methods different? Date: 01/08/2002 at 13:06:43 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Estimation vs. rounding Hi, Pam. Here's the simple answer: rounding means taking a known value and making it less accurate; estimation means coming up with an inaccurate number you didn't have in an exact form to start with. So if I measure a table as 4 feet 1 inch wide, and call it 4 feet, I'm rounding. If I just look at it and say it's about 4 feet wide, I'm estimating. You can use rounding as one step in estimation. To estimate the sum 423 + 695, I might round both numbers to 400 + 700, and then add to get 1100. This result is an estimate of the sum of the original numbers. If I instead added directly to get the exact answer, 1118, and then rounded to get 1100, I would be rounding rather than estimating. Often the two results will be different; rounding will be closer (given the same level of precision) because adding after rounding allows errors to accumulate. For example, I might estimate 444 + 649 as 400 + 600 = 1000, when the exact answer is 1093, which rounds to 1100. Knowing this, I would actually be careful not to round both numbers down, but would instead round 649 up (since it is so close to 650), and get 400 + 700 = 1100 as a better estimate. If what I've discussed is not quite the kind of problem you are dealing with, you might want to show me some specific examples so we can see where the difference arises. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/