|


Order of Operations: Math vs. English; CalculatorsDate: 11/13/96 at 14:07:41 From: Eaton,William Subject: Order of operations The following problem was looked at by the math department, and we could not come to an agreement, especially after several scientific and graphing calculators didn't show the same answer. Here's the problem: 144 divided by 3(8 + 4) We couldn't find the division symbol on the keyboard and we thought that using it would make the problem too obvious. Please advise us on the correct answer and give a brief explanation of how you found the answer. Thank you from the Cincinnatus math and science educators. Date: 01/11/97 at 16:15:07 From: Doctor Donald Subject: Re: Order of operations Dear Cincinnatus Math and Science Teachers, The order of operations is a convention that is followed by everybody who writes or solves mathematical expressions. You can say that you don't subscribe to the convention but that doesn't make it any less of a convention. Briefly stated, the order of operations means that given a mathematical expression, first you evaluate any expressions in parentheses (using the order of operations on the stuff inside the parentheses), then you evaluate exponents. After that you do division and multiplication, which have the same precedence, which means that you compute them from left to right. Finally you do any addition and subtraction, which have the same precedence and are also computed from left to right. If you have any other questions regarding the order of operations, consult our FAQ on this subject at: http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.order.operations.html What calculators may or may not do is either a matter of experimentation or finding a description in the manual. Calculator manufacturers do not see fit to subscribe to any universal convention and do what they please, sometimes, but not always, explaining in the manual what they are doing. Because they don't subscribe to all conventions, we have a kind of chaos in the classroom, with students being unsure of which convention applies. The upshot is that just about any expression you write down has to be interpreted in the context that applies to where you intend to use it. If the expression contains only mathematical notation, you can use the order of operations. If it is a combination of mathematical notation and English, then the order of operations can only be applied once you have translated the expression into something containing only mathematical notation. When English is involved, things tend to get a little confusing because it is difficult to tell where extra parentheses might be placed since English is very good at implying parentheses without ever writing them down. In fact I know of no calculator permitting the use of expressions (i.e., graphing calculators and the like) that does not subscribe to the conventional order of operations. But there are 'primitive' calculators that will evaluate the keystrokes (for example) 4 + 3 * 7 as 49, when this expression in conventional evaluation means 4 + 21 = 25. I am not sure what your calculators did with your expression. Perhaps you could be more explicit as to the different answers you actually found using your calculators. The problem with finding the answer to "144 divided by 3(8+4)" lies in the fact that this expression contains both English and mathematical notation. Another issue is what kind of division symbol you were looking for on the keyboard (and how this influenced your use of English in your question). Regardless of whether you use the fraction bar or the minus sign with dots on the top and bottom of it, the answer to the expression is the same. Using the fraction bar translates "144 divided by 3(8+4)" into 144 ----- 3(8+4) which means "144 divided by the quantity 3(8+4)." Using the traditional division sign (expressed as a slash on the computer), the original expression is translated into 144/[3(8+4)], whose English translation is the same as the expression using the fraction bar. The brackets are used in the expression to make it absolutely clear that 144 is not divided by just 3. Using either of these translations, you first compute 3(8+4) because parentheses come first in the order of operations. This is equal to 3(12). Next comes multiplication, which produces 3(12) = 36. Finally comes division, which leaves us with the answer 144/36 = 4. This is the conventional interpretation of the expression that you gave. Another interpretation of your expression is that it means "144 divided by 3 times the quantity (8+4)." In mathematical notation, this is written as (144/3)(8+4). Following the order of operations, you compute the value of each of the expressions in parentheses and then multiply those two numbers. This means that your simplified expression will read (48)(12) = 576. This answer is obviously quite different from the first one and is not the standard answer to "144 divided by 3(8+4)," but it is a possible one since the use of English in the question leads to the existence of a good deal of ambiguity. The "correct" answer to your problem is 4 because this answer results from the conventional interpretation of the wording in your expression. -Doctors Donald and Rachel, The Math Forum Check out our web site! http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2008 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/