e and pi and How They Were FoundDate: 5 Jan 1995 18:08:41 -0500 From: James Chen Subject: e and pi Hi. My name is James, and I have a question about how the numbers 'e' and pi came about. I already know what the numbers are; what I want to know is what they are and how we came about finding them. Thanks. James C. Date: 9 Jan 1995 17:02:12 -0500 From: Dr. Ken Subject: Re: e and pi Hello there! Well, first I'll talk a little bit about the number Pi. I assume that since you know about the existence of the natural log, you are already pretty familiar with Pi, so I won't say as much about it. Pi, by definition, is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. Pi is a very old number. We know that the Egyptians and the Babylonians knew about the existence of the constant ratio Pi, although they really didn't know how big it was. They had figured out that it was a little bigger than 3; the Babylonians had an approximation of 3 1/8, and the Egyptians had a slightly worse approximation of 4*(8/9)^2. Worse in a couple of ways, since it's harder to work with than the Babylonian approximation. If you want to know a whole lot about Pi, you can look at the book "A History of Pi" by Petr Beckman. It's published by Dorset Press. On to e! Since a very similar question came in a couple of days ago, I'll forward that response on to you. Enjoy! __________ Date: Sun, 8 Jan 1995 13:01:03 -0500 (EST) From ken Sun Jan 8 13:01:03 1995 Subject: Re: your mail Hello there! I'll just go through and handle your questions one-by-one. I'm glad you're interested in knowing more! 1) Why is e so important? Well, in a sense, e is important simply because it has all those nice properties you've been studying. Whenever you take the derivative of e^x (that's e to the x), you get e^x back again. It's the only function on Earth that will do that (except things like 5 e^x and variants like that). That's pretty cool stuff. When I learned calculus, here's the order we defined things in: first, we had the definite integral (from 1 to x) of 1/u du. We knew that had to be some function of x, so we defined a new function Ln (x). It was defined as the area under the curve 1/u. So the derivative of Ln(x) is automatically 1/x, but as of yet we hadn't looked at what this function Ln _looked_ like. So then we used this definition of ours to figure out a few things about Ln: we looked at Ln(ab), which was defined as the integral from 1 to ab of 1/u du, and we decided that Ln(ab) was Ln(a) + Ln(b). "Aha!" we said. "It's starting to look like a logarithmic function!" So then we verified that it really was a logarithmic function, and we figured out what the base of the logarithm was. To do this, we looked at when the function Ln(x) gave us 1. "Whoa," we said, "that's no number I've ever seen before." Of course, we really had seen it before, in folk tales and legends and when our big sisters brought home their calculus homework, but this was the first time we'd really seen it in a math class. So we took that mysterious number and gave it a name, just in case we'd run into it later. As it turns out, we sure did. We ran into it in the population growth problems, in the statistics problems, in the sequences and series problems, and pretty much all over the place. So we were glad we gave it a name (incidentally, the "e" comes from Euler, who gave it its name). Then we thought, "hey, let's turn it around. Instead of looking at the logarithm with the base e, let's look at the exponential function to the base e." And we did, and it was good. We found that the derivative of e^x was e^x all over again, and we fell on our knees. We learned that e^x was equal to 1 + x + x^2/2! + x^3/3! + x^4/4! + .... and we begged for mercy. Or something like that. Then we learned that e^(i*Pi) + 1 = 0. This was most impressive to us, since here was one equation that linked the five most important numbers in mathematics: e,i,Pi,1, and 0. It also had the three fundamental operations: adding, multiplying, and raising to a power. And it had the most fundamental concept in all of mathematics, that of equality. And it had nothing else. No extra seven floating around, no "plus c" or anything like that. I recommend that you write it down on a piece of paper for yourself, without all the extra junk I have to use when I type it out on the computer, the parentheses and the carrot and everything. So that's pretty neat. What was your question again? Oh yeah. Personally, I'd put e right on par with Pi, although some people wouldn't think so. Certainly more people have heard of Pi; there is mention of it in the Old Testament of the Bible, and e didn't come about until long after that (logarithms were invented in the 16th and 17th centuries, and it probably took a little while until people noticed that e was a nice base). Incidentally, Logs were developed by John Napier, who lived from 1550 to 1617, and published his stuff about Logs in about 1594. He coined the word Logarithm, which means "number of the ratio", as in the common ratio of a geometric sequence. It's kind of a shame that he gave such a simple idea such a scary name. Anyway, e and Pi are both numbers that will pop out of your problems when you least expect it, and I'd say that they do it with about the same frequency. Of course, you won't get e popping out until calculus, since you don't define it until then (trying to define it before calculus would be kind of hairy. I can see it now: the teacher would say "e is a nice number to raise to powers and to use as a base for logarithms." "Why?" "Well, I can't tell you. Wait until calculus." They say that too much already.). As far as there being other nice numbers that come up all the time, e and Pi are certainly the two biggies. There's another number, called the golden ratio, which is (1+Sqrt{5})/2. It doesn't look all that nice at first glance, but it has some nice properties too, and the Greeks liked it a lot. But it doesn't come up nearly as much as e or Pi, so I guess it's not on par with the giants. I guess e and Pi are kind of the Burger King and McDonald's of the math world, and the golden ratio is like a Hardee's or something. So that's how I feel about e. -Ken "Dr." Math |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/