Bar over a Whole Number?Date: 06/05/2001 at 20:52:27 From: Sandy Taylor Subject: Pre-algebra What does a bar over a whole number indicate? I am a 6th grade teacher and I am using a set of problems to prepare my students for an algebra readiness test. For example,we were asked to arrange this list in order from greatest to least: __ _ _ 67, 0.6, 0.67, 0.67, 6 We know that a bar over a decimal means the decimal repeats, but we don't know what a bar over a whole number means. Date: 06/06/2001 at 18:23:49 From: Doctor Douglas Subject: Re: Pre-algebra Hi Sandy, and thanks for writing. The notation of a bar (vinculum, or overbar) over a whole number doesn't seem to be very common. Here are some possibilities as to what it could mean: It is sometimes used as a grouping symbol, as in a fraction: _____ __ 3 + 1 x 5 = 20 so 67 = 67 I have also seen it used to refer to the average: _ __ x = {1,2,6}, x = 3 so 67 = 67 (the average of one number is itself, of course). I have also heard that it can be used to mean "1000 times whatever is underneath", especially with Roman numerals - see the following Web page, Final Answers by Gerard P. Michon: http://home.att.net/~numericana/answer/culture.htm#bars __ __ IV = 4000 (or MMMM) so 67 = 67000 I hope this helps. - Doctor Douglas, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ Date: 06/07/2001 at 09:16:12 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Pre-algebra Hi, Sandy. I see that Dr. Douglas has answered you with several possibilities. I, too, have never seen this notation, but I think we should include the obvious possibility from the context: that the vinculum represents repeated decimals, as usual. __ _ My guess is that 67 means 67.67676767..., and 6 means 6.6666... . That is, they are extending the usage of the vinculum from its normal usage after the decimal point, allowing it to be used before the decimal, but still meaning that the digits included are to be repeated forever to the right. Again, I've never seen the vinculum in this sense used to the left of the decimal; but if you want to define it that way, I see no problems. The only problem is that if a text is going to use such a notation, they should (a) tell you what it means, and (b) say that it is non- standard, so you won't try to use it elsewhere and find that nobody understands you! - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/