Explaining Independent and Dependent Variables
Date: 10/25/2002 at 13:01:00 From: Tony Restrepo Subject: Independent and dependent variable Dr. Math, I want the definition of independent and dependent variables. The definitions I have are: independent: the value that we can change dependent: the value that is determined by the independent variable Can you elaborate in detail to help the students understand this a little more clearly, especially with real world problems? Thank you, Tony Restrepo
Date: 10/25/2002 at 15:53:54 From: Doctor Achilles Subject: Re: Independent and dependent variable Hi Tony, Thanks for writing to Dr. Math. I think of independent and dependent variables in terms of functions. I'm not sure if your students have been taught functions yet; if not, you may have to modify this elaboration of independent/dependent variables. A function, the way I think of it, is a little mathematical box. You put in numbers, variables, constants, or anything else that you can do math on, and it will put out an answer. Let's say I tell you that I have a function in mind. I'm not going to tell you what the function is, but I am going to let you give me any numbers you like, and I will tell you what the output of the numbers is. So you start guessing numbers and I start telling you the function outputs for each guess. guess output 1 4 2 7 3 12 4 19 5 28 By now, you may have some guesses as to what the function is. Of course, there are many (actually an infinite number of) functions that COULD give rise to this behavior. The simplest one I can think of (and the one that I had in mind) was: f(x) = x^2 + 3 [x-squared plus 3] It may seem as if this is a fairly contrived and artificial example, but it is actually a pretty good model of what scientific investigation is all about. Science can be thought of as the process of investigating what mathematical functions nature uses for everything it [nature] does. Let's say I want to find out how deep in the soil a penny goes as a function of the height from which I drop it. How would I do that? Well, I'd drop it from different heights, and measure how deep it goes. I can then come up with an equation that relates the height I dropped the penny from, x, with the depth it went into the ground, f(x). For another example, let's say that I'm a medical researcher testing a new treatment for insomnia. I know that a given drug helps, but I want to know how much is needed. If I have 5 doses I want to test, and 500 people participating in the study, then I can give each dose to 100 people. I then find out the next day what percentage of each group had a good night's sleep. I can then relate the dose of drug x to the probability of a good night's sleep, f(x), using a mathematical equation. What does the height I drop the penny from in the first example have to do with the dose of drug in the second example? Well, they are both things I control. In both cases, I want to find an equation that relates two variables. It is impossible for me to make the penny go a certain depth and then ask what height it fell from; the only thing I can do is adjust the height and then measure the depth. Similarly, it is impossible for me to make the probability of a good night's sleep whatever number I want and then ask what dose of drug I gave to do that; the only thing I can do is adjust the dose of drug and then measure the probability of a good night's sleep. The height from which I drop and the dose of drug are therefore variables that I have control over. You can think of them as "free" variables or "controllable" variables. These are perfectly acceptable terms for input variables, and they are actually used occasionally in science; there's nothing wrong with these terms at all. Once I pick a height to drop from, or a dose of drug, the depth the penny will go and the probability of a good night's sleep are set by whatever function nature uses (I don't know yet what the function is, but whatever it is, I don't have control over the output). You can think of depth and probability (in these examples) as "determined" or "uncontrollable" variables. Even though there is no problem with the terms "free" and "controllable," there is a problem with the terms "determined" and "uncontrollable." The problem is that the output is not COMPLETELY pre-determined or completely uncontrollable; rather, it is simply determined once you pick the value of the input variable. So a better way to think of the output is that it is DEPENDENT on the input variable. In addition to being called "free," the input variable can be thought of as "independent" because you can freely and independently change it to whatever you want. While I personally agree that independent is an acceptable way to think of the input variable, to be honest, I think that "free" is a much better way to describe it. But, because "determined" is NOT an acceptable way to describe the output variable and people like the way "independent and dependent" sounds more than they like the sound of "free and dependent," it is most common to call the input "independent." Science would be trivial if we knew beforehand what functions nature uses, but we have to just figure them out by trying a bunch of different inputs (independent variables) and seeing what outputs (dependent variables) we get for each. I hope this helps. If you have other questions about this or you'd like to talk about this some more, please write back. - Doctor Achilles, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
Date: 10/25/2002 at 18:05:18 From: Tony Restrepo Subject: Thank you (Independent and dependent variable) Thank you for your prompt and helpful response. I really liked the term "free" as the variables that I have control over.
Search the Dr. Math Library:
Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.