![]() |
Teacher2Teacher |
Q&A #1280 |

T2T || FAQ || Ask T2T || Teachers' Lounge || Browse || Search || Thanks || About T2T

|
View entire discussion [<< prev] [ next >>]
From: Shelly To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion Date: 2000053114:51:17 Subject: Re: Chicago Math reviews Last year I facilitated my then district's search for a new K-6 curriculum. The team (7 teachers and two support people) ALL identified Everyday Mathematics (the UCSMP's elementary series) as exemplary in it's development of rich mathematical understanding and in the nature of the support materials for teachers. The "peer" schools using EM had the greatest gains and highest scores in state testing. The teachers and supervisors in those districts did warn that the scope/ sequence does represent a departure from the traditional that was initially disturbing to parents because it does not focus on memorization of, and drill on basic number facts. I suggest that teachers would have to augment the program a bit to support fluency with facts, perhaps with some 3-minute drills, etc. I heartily endorse the EM materials.
Post a reply to this message
|
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

Math Forum Home ||
The Math Library ||
Quick Reference ||
Math Forum Search

The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.