Q&A #2916

Teachers' Lounge Discussion: Accelerated Math program

T2T || FAQ || Ask T2T || Teachers' Lounge || Browse || Search || Thanks || About T2T

View entire discussion
[<< prev] [ next >>]

From: Tim Wilcox <twilcox@mde.k12.ms.us>
To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion
Date: 2003052114:44:49
Subject: AM usage and strategies

I am the information systems specialist for our district. I support AM
hardware, software and teacher training. We have three K-12 schools of
varying sizes, all using AM 3-12 for the past three years. Many of the
comments on this list are familiar, so I will try to address them with
some conclusions we have made at the district administrative level.

OBJECTIVE MASTERY- Educational objectives, curriculum frameworks,
benchmarks - whatever you call them - are elements of a responsible
educational program. It is not the teacher's sole responsibility to
establish the basic curriculum because the teacher is not the only
investor in the process. The teacher follows the guides given him/her
and implements instruction according to the established objectives. AM
is a great tool for managing these objectives. With a little
preplanning, the AM objectives can be matched to the district or state
framework. AM can show mastery and non-mastery of objectives daily,
instead of waiting for the test on Friday.AM can be used as an
end-of-the-year objective mastery tool. Unless teachers are keying
objectives to assignments from a textbook or teacher made work and
then assessing each exercise to determine percentage correct per
objective, they cannot compete with the management capability of AM.

AM PRIMARY vs. SUPPLEMENTAL- In our district, very few teachers have
been successful using AM exclusively. Most teachers feel that a
central instructional format (textbook, Saxon) tethers the students to
the content. The AM practice then spirals around the objectives.
Remember, the teacher assigns the objectives in AM and they should not
be assigned in the order they appear on the AM assignment book, rather
the order they are taught in the classroom. AM is not a curriculum, it
is an instructional manangement tool.

CLASSROOM IMPLEMENTATION- This debate will never be settled because so
much of the answer lies in the teaching style of the teacher. A large
number of our teachers have adopted the "power lesson" approach where
a 20-25 minute instructional period 2 to 5 times per week is followed
by AM practice. During the practice, teachers are free from the
whiteboard to remediate, reteach in small groups and assess progress.
The teachers who (IMHO) structure the AM process with age appropriate
independent resposibilities for the students see the greatest success.
Those who constantly insert themselves into the process unnecessarily
(scanning for students, manually printing subsequent practice
exercises, using only AM management instead of quickscan) are
overwrought with frustration and feel unable to meet time restraints.
Those teachers who have a clearly defined classroom routine (1. get
cards from box a, 2. complete practice, 3. seek help with problems, 4.
scan your cards when finished, 5. review TOPS and place in basket for
me to review with you later, 6. place used cards in box b., restart
#1.) Seem to have more quality instructional time in their day. In
other words, teachers who must CONTROL every aspect of the learning
process are less likely to use AM than those who PLAN, STRUCTURE and

I also taught elementary school for 9 years, so I know how difficult
managing and motivating can be with a comprehensive software package
like AM. My question in response is "How many different learning
processes are you monitoring and motivating in your classroom with a
much less efficient return on your effort invested?" If you are not
motivating AM then you are motivating something else, or your not

I welcome any comments or questions.

Post a reply to this message
Post a related public discussion message
Ask Teacher2Teacher a new question

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

Math Forum Home || The Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search

Teacher2Teacher - T2T ®
© 1994-2014 Drexel University. All rights reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel School of Education.The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.