Teacher2Teacher

Q&A #6073

Teachers' Lounge Discussion: Mathematical terminology

_____________________________________
T2T || FAQ || Ask T2T || Teachers' Lounge || Browse || Search || Thanks || About T2T
_____________________________________

View entire discussion
[<< prev] [ next >>]

From: pat ballew <pat.ballew@eu.dodea.edu>
To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion
Date: 2005082812:30:14
Subject: Re: terminology

A single source for this and most of the other questions that have
been asked in this string is http://www.pballew.net/etyindex.html  

For example, if you click on repeating decimal, you will find,
"vinculum, fraction bar, "repeat bar" As a "Math Doctor", one of the
most common questions asked by elementary school students is, "What is
the name for the bar over repeating decimal fractions?" I always
answer that "repeat bar" seems the best name to communicate what it
does, but I know they want the classic Latin name for the bar,
vinculum. The word is from the diminutive of vincere, to tie. vinculum
referred to a small cord for binding the hands or feet. The meaning in
math is mostly unchanged from that original meaning, as the purpose of
the repeat bar is to bind together the sequence of repeating digits.
The term repeating decimal has sometimes been replaced with
"recurrent" or "Circulating". The sequence of digits which repeat have
also been called the "circulants" and "repetends" (and sometimes
"repetents"). The vinculum notation was once used in much the same way
we now use parenthesis and brackets to "bind together" a group of
numbers or symbols. Originally the line was placed under the items to
be grouped although a bar over the grouping became the more lasting
usage (and still is in the symbols for roots and the one for
division).

It is in the expression for repeating decimals that students are most
familiar with the use of the overbar as a symbol, yet it seems to have
been the last application of the bar, and seems not to have occured
until after 1930 in the US. In F. Cajori's A History of Mathematical
Notations (1929) he points out two forms of marking repeating
sequences in decimals but does not mention the vincula or overbar.
Cajori credits John Marsh [Decimal Arithmetic Made Perfect, (London,
1742)] with being the first to use a symbol to indicate the repeat
sequence. Marsh sometimes placed a single dot over the first number in
the repeat sequence, and sometimes placed one on the first and last. "
and much more... 

hope this is a help.. 

Pat




Post a reply to this message
Post a related public discussion message
Ask Teacher2Teacher a new question


[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

_____________________________________
Math Forum Home || The Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search
_____________________________________

Teacher2Teacher - T2T ®
© 1994-2014 Drexel University. All rights reserved.
http://mathforum.org/
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel School of Education.The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.