Teacher2Teacher |
Q&A #17073 |
View entire discussion [<<prev]
Hi Davina, Thanks for your question. I prefer the sequence that you are suggesting: >I feel that this should change to >Algebra 1-Grade 8 >Geometry - Grade 9 >Algebra 2 - Grade 10 The reason is, Geometry provides a nice application of basic algebra 1 concepts and geometry is not dependent on algebra 2 concepts that I have ever seen. Some people argue that delaying geometry a year helps the students since geometry is more abstract and that gives them another year of maturity. I found the maturity to play more to the needs of algebra 2 which I find to be a very challenging course. Anyway, these are all just my beliefs. I have no research to back it up except for a lot of informal observations. Good luck, >I teach high school at a small district. Right now the curriculum is >Algebra 1 Grade 8 >Algebra 2 Grade 9 >Geometry Grade 10 > >I feel that this should change to >Algebra 1-Grade 8 >Geometry - Grade 9 >Algebra 2 - Grade 10 > >Is this a good recommendation that I should take to the school board? > >Thank you >Math Department Head -Cynthia, for the T2T service Thanks for visiting our on-line community. Visit Teacher2Teacher again at http://mathforum.org/t2t/ It is now possible to make a financial contribution to help The Math Forum. Please read more about this possibility: http://www.drexel.edu/ia/mathforum/.
Post a public
discussion message |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Math Forum Home ||
The Math Library ||
Quick Reference ||
Math Forum Search