Teacher2Teacher |
Q&A #838 |
View entire discussion [next>>]
My official definition "in the book" for kite is as follows, "A kite is a quadrilateral in which two disjoint pairs of consecutive sides are congruent." This leads students to believe that a rhombus would not be considered a kite. Is this correct? I thought a rhombus was a kite. Do I need to include the word disjoint in my definition. Thanks for the help!!
Post a public
discussion message |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Math Forum Home ||
The Math Library ||
Quick Reference ||
Math Forum Search