T2T || FAQ || Ask T2T || Teachers' Lounge || Browse || Search || Thanks || About T2T
View entire discussion
My official definition "in the book" for kite is as follows, "A kite is a quadrilateral in which two disjoint pairs of consecutive sides are congruent." This leads students to believe that a rhombus would not be considered a kite. Is this correct? I thought a rhombus was a kite. Do I need to include the word disjoint in my definition. Thanks for the help!!
Math Forum Home || The Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search